Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto Logo
Mary Jane Wilmoth - Whistleblower Attorney

Mary Jane Wilmoth

Managing Partner

Contact Mary Jane
[email protected]

What Clients are Saying

"Among the most experienced and skilled attorneys practicing in the specialization of whistleblower law"

Decision Awarding Attorneys Fees in Hobby v. Georgia Power Co.
Linda Tripp

"I couldn't have navigated the shark invested waters whistleblower face without the passion, dedication, determination, and brilliance of my incredible attorneys."

"…the three co-founders of the National Whistleblower Center, these are important names, Stephen Kohn, Michael Kohn and David Colapinto, thank you so much for all that you do, they broke the mold with these visionaries and we are all better for it." – National Whistleblower Day, 2018

Linda Tripp, Retaliation Whistleblower

Mary Jane's Latest Thinking

Appeals Court to Decide Major Whistleblower Reward Case

November 15th, 2017|Tax Fraud, Whistleblower News and Qui Tam Blog|

Criminal fines and penalties at issue Washington, D.C.  November 15, 2017. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear argument in the most important tax whistleblower case ever filed in court.  At issue in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Whistleblower 21276-13Wis whether the tax whistleblower law covers employees who report criminal tax fraud. “This case will determine whether or not the tax whistleblower law will work.  We are arguing that whistleblowers who report criminal tax frauds are covered under the law, and can obtain rewards when a fraudster is criminally prosecuted for ripping of the taxpayers.  The Tax Court agreed with our arguments.  Remarkably, the Trump administration’s Justice and Treasury Departments are seeking to overturn the lower court decision, and exclude criminal tax fraud from the whistleblower law,” said Stephen M. Kohn, co-counsel for the confidential whistleblower who filed the claim.                      ...

Senator Grassley Backs Whistleblower in Major Tax Case

October 27th, 2017|Tax Fraud, Whistleblower News and Qui Tam Blog|

Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, filed an amicus curiae brief in a closely watched tax whistleblower case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  The case, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Whistleblower 21276-13W concerns the right of a confidential tax whistleblower to obtain a reward based on a criminal tax case.  The case will set nation-wide precedent concerning the scope of the IRS whistleblower law.  The government argued that two whistleblowers who exposed criminal tax fraud, and were the key witnesses against the corporate-fraudsters, were ineligible for a reward because the federal government criminally prosecuted the tax cheats.  The government argued that only smaller, non-criminal cases were eligible for rewards.  In his amicus brief Senator Grassley, the principal sponsor of the tax whistleblower law, argued that the informants in this case made “precisely the types” of whistleblower disclosures the law as “intended to generate.”   According to Senator Grassley: “The ...

Senator Grassley and SEC File Amicus Briefs in Crucial Supreme Court Case

October 19th, 2017|Securities, Whistleblower News and Qui Tam Blog|

On Tuesday, October 17, 2017, Senator Charles Grassley and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) each filed amicus briefs in Digital Realty Trust v. Somers (No. 16-1276). In this important case, the SEC’s Whistleblower program and corporate compliance programs are on the line as the U.S. Supreme Court determines whether whistleblowers who report potential violations to company management but not to the SEC are protected from retaliation under the Dodd-Frank Act. Sen. Grassley and the SEC join the National Whistleblower Center, which also filed an amicus, in asking the Supreme Court to uphold the court of appeals decision in support of the whistleblower.  Important links: Brief amici curiae of National Whistleblower Center, et al. filed. Brief amicus curiae of Senator Charles Grassley filed. Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. Law 360: Clarifying Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Dodd-Frank Law 360: Digital Realty Trust V. Somers May Kill Corporate Compliance  

Our Client Received the Largest Whistleblower Reward in World History of $104 Million

Bradley Birkenfeld broke the back of Swiss bank secrecy. He was the first Swiss banker to file a case under the IRS whistleblower law. The results were unprecedented. UBS bank (at the time the largest bank in the world) had to pay a fine of $780 million. They also had to close all known U.S. accounts, and for the first time in history, the bank turned over the names of 4450 U.S. taxpayers for prosecution in the United States. Mr. Birkenfeld obtained the largest ever individual qui tam whistleblower award in history, $104 million.

Mary Jane's Successful Legal Advocacy

Legal Advocacy

Pro Bono Public Service

Dedicated to protecting whistleblowers, the National Whistleblower Center (NWC) was founded in 1988 by three experienced whistleblower-rights attorneys, Stephen M. Kohn, Michael D. Kohn and David K. Colapinto. Mary Jane was selected as the NWC's first Public Interest Law Fellow, and soon became a major leader in the NWC. She currently is the NWC corporate Treasure and serves on its Board of Directors. She founded the whistleblower protection blog, and for years managed many of the NWC's highly successful programs.

Go to Top