RULE 8
Document, Document, Document
Introduction
Without proper documentation, a whistleblowing case may lack substance. Essential evidence, such as emails indicating wrongful termination, inconsistent financial audits, or ship logs with missing oil dumping entries, bolsters the whistleblower’s position.
However, this doesn’t justify unauthorized entry into a supervisor’s office. Instead, report your concerns to the appropriate government agency and allow their investigators to conduct the necessary inquiries.
Resources
Under New Jersey state law, an employer that destroys evidence not only can have an adverse inference drawn against it, but can also be liable for the tort of fraudulent concealment:
- Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber, 961 A.2d 1167 (N.J. 2008).
Also see:
- Barnes v. United States, 373 F.2d 517, 518 (5th Cir. 1967)
- McLindon v. United States, 329 F.2d 238 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
- Watson v. United States, 391 F.2d 927 (5th Cir. 1968)
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Rules
Order Your Copy Today!
All purchases or donations proceeds go to support the National Whistleblower Center, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to supporting whistleblowers.
Shipping is to the United States Only
For international orders, please contact orders@kkc.com.