Abusive trust schemes, or “sham trusts,” are used by fraudsters to evade paying taxes. These complex schemes involve creating several trusts and transferring high-value assets like vehicles, houses, boats, and other luxury goods into them, and sometimes even businesses.
These schemes aim to hide the true owner (the taxpayer) and make it seem as if the income these assets generate doesn’t belong to them. The scheme can further obfuscate matters by having trusts hold ownership interests in other trusts, making it difficult to track income flow.
Tax preparers and financial advisors promote these tax schemes, promising to help their clients reduce or eliminate income tax or create deductions or depreciate assets paid by the trust. They may also tout it to get out of paying self-employment, gift, or estate taxes.
Common Trust Schemes
There are two basic schemes that promotors might use, which are:
Domestic package
A domestic package in an abusive trust tax evasion scheme typically includes:
- Trust documents: The promoters will help you set up trusts, which are legal entities that hold assets on behalf of beneficiaries. In this scheme, the trust structure is intended to be confusing and layered, making it seem like you don’t control your income (which is untrue).
- Domestic trustee: This could be someone designated by the promoter to act as the trustee of your trust. The idea is to distance yourself from the trust’s assets further (again, for misleading purposes).
- Tax return preparation: Some schemes may include help with filing tax returns using the newly created trust structure. It’s important to remember that these returns will likely be misleading and could lead to serious trouble with the IRS.
It’s important to understand that these domestic packages are illegal and do not work. The IRS is aware of these schemes and actively pursues those who participate in them.
Foreign package
A foreign package in an abusive trust tax evasion scheme typically involves setting up a series of trusts and entities in foreign countries, often tax havens known for secrecy. These countries may have little to no tax on trusts. Here’s a breakdown of how it works:
- Multiple Trusts: The promoter will help establish several trusts, usually in different countries.
- Tax Haven Countries: These trusts are often created in countries with lax tax regulations and banking secrecy laws.
- Funneling Money: Money is then funneled through these trusts, creating a complex web that makes it difficult for tax authorities to track the income.
- Fake Expenses: The scheme may involve creating fake expenses or inflating legitimate ones to reduce the taxable income shown in each trust.
- Maintaining Control: While the ownership appears to have been transferred, the taxpayer often retains a significant degree of control over the assets through the trust structure.
Essentially, the goal is to make the income appear to disappear through a web of foreign trusts, allowing the taxpayer to avoid paying taxes.
It’s important to remember that these schemes are illegal and can result in hefty fines and even jail time. If you’re approached with a tax reduction plan that involves foreign trusts, it’s best to consult with a reputable tax advisor to ensure you’re not getting involved in something illegal.
Substance, Not Form, Controls Taxation
This is a legal principle that says the underlying reality of a situation matters more than the technical details. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that it is the substance and not the form of a transaction that is controlled for the purpose of taxation. In other words, this means the IRS cares more about the true nature of a financial transaction than how you try to structure it on paper to minimize your taxes.
IRS Office of the Whistleblower
Tax whistleblowers with solid information of a sham trust evasion scheme may be eligible for a whistleblower award between 15 and 30 percent of the proceeds collected in a successful recovery by the IRS. However, there are several factors the IRS considers in determining award eligibility:
- $2 Million Threshold: The tax noncompliance must exceed $2,000,000 – this includes taxes evaded, penalties, interest, and other fees. If the trust scheme is related to a single taxpayer who has a gross income exceeding $200,000 for at least one tax year in question.
- Qualify of Information: The IRS is seeking original, specific, and credible information. Award amounts decrease for claims based on information from public sources OR if the whistleblower was involved in the tax noncompliance.
- IRC Section 7623(b) or 7623(a): A whistleblower submission must meet the criteria for IRC Section 7623(b). If it does not, the IRS may consider it for their discretionary program under IRC Section 7623(a).
Financial awards are also available to non-U.S. citizens who blow the whistle on U.S. taxpayers involved in foreign abusive trust tax trust schemes. However, these whistleblowers must be accompanied by a U.S-based attorney.
Those who are employees of the Department of Treasury or receive information through their official duties as an employee or as a contractor of the federal government are excluded from receiving awards under the program.
Have information? Learn more about the IRS Whistleblower Program and get in touch with a reputable IRS whistleblower attorney for legal assistance.
Our Firm Can Help
Since the inception of the IRS whistleblower program, our firm has been behind around one third of all IRS whistleblower cases, including one of the most notorious tax whistleblower reward cases in history (Bradley Birkenfeld, $104 million). If you’re seeking an experienced ally you can absolutely trust, look no further than Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto LLP.
Our Firm’s Cases
$104 Million Reward
As an international banker at UBS in Switzerland, Bradley Birkenfeld exposed a massive tax evasion scheme, leading UBS to disclose over 4,450 U.S. tax evaders and pay a $780 million fine to the IRS. He was awarded $104 million by the IRS for his information.
$98 Million Award
The tax whistleblower exposed major international illegal tax schemes for offshore banks. This whistleblower’s allegations led to 387 US payers getting caught red-handed, having stashed millions in illegal offshore accounts.
$100 Million Exposed
Alex Cherpuko, a 21-year-old whistleblower at the time, exposed a $100 million criminal enterprise, securing a $69.6 million judgment and becoming the first to simultaneously use False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank Act, and IRS whistleblower laws.
Relevant FAQs
Latest News & Insights
Ready to blow the whistle? Our experienced team is here to protect your rights and guide you through the process. Contact us today for a confidential consultation.