HomeFTX’s Collapse Highlights Importance of Cryptocurrency Whistleblowers

FTX’s Collapse Highlights Importance of Cryptocurrency Whistleblowers

This article originally appeared in JD Supra.

The sudden collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX has heightened concerns over the lack of regulations for the cryptocurrency market. Commentators quickly compared FTX’s collapse to the Enron scandal and the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers. These events triggered major Wall Street reform. U.S. authorities are actively investigating FTX for fraud. One thing is clear: in the wake of FTX’s collapse, U.S. regulatory bodies must fully utilize whistleblower programs in regulating the cryptocurrency industry.

The comparison between FTX and Enron is notable because of the critical role a whistleblower, Sherron Watkins, played in exposing Enron’s accounting fraud. Insiders with direct knowledge of fraud are vital in exposing financial misconduct, holding fraudsters accountable, and protecting investors.

Luckily, strong whistleblower provisions already exist for individuals blowing the whistle on cryptocurrency fraud. Following the 2008 financial collapse, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act establishing whistleblower award programs at both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), two agencies with jurisdiction over cryptocurrency fraud.

The SEC or CFTC may consider cryptocurrency a security or commodity if marketed as an investment by a particular company, such as an Initial Coin Offering (ICO). The SEC and CFTC have jurisdiction over fraudulent and manipulative activities in the virtual currency market. Such activities include market manipulation, insider trading, Ponzi schemes, money laundering, tax avoidance, and the bribery of foreign officials which violates the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act.

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC and CFTC must provide monetary awards to individuals who voluntarily provide high-quality, original, timely, and credible information that leads to an enforcement action that exceeds more than $ 1 million in sanctions. The award ranges from 10% and 30% of monetary sanctions collected. Whistleblowers do not need to be individuals that are insiders. Anyone with original information, such as victims of the schemes and misconduct, may be eligible for an award.

The SEC and CFTC whistleblower programs have been immense successes. Since becoming law in 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act has allowed the SEC to use whistleblower information to obtain over $5 billion from securities law violators. It has also awarded over $1.3 billion to whistleblowers for their acts. In the same timeframe, the CFTC has awarded $123 million to whistleblowers who have assisted the CFTC in recovering over $1 billion.

In addition to initiating large amounts of sanctions and rewarding whistleblowers, the SEC and CFTC whistleblower programs have been immensely successful in returning funds to harmed investors. The SEC has returned over $1.3 billion to investors thanks to whistleblowers. On October 31, the SEC awarded $10 million to a whistleblower whose disclosure resulted in the agency returning “a significant amount of money to harmed investors.”

FTX’s collapse has left customers and investors, including celebrities like NFL star Tom Brady, in limbo and unsure whether they will get their money back. As more and more Americans pour money into the cryptocurrency industry, whistleblowers will be a necessary tool in protecting their funds from fraud.

Cryptocurrency whistleblowers are already coming forward to U.S. authorities in high numbers. In its recent annual report to Congress, the CFTC Whistleblower Program reported that a majority of the whistleblower tips it received in the 2022 fiscal year “involved fraudulent misappropriation and fraudulent solicitation involving crypto/digital assets.”

The SEC and CFTC must fully utilize their whistleblower programs to be the best cops they can be on the cryptocurrency beat. By continuing to leverage insider information, the agencies can protect the American public as it continues to invest in the cryptocurrency industry.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Latest News & Insights

  • December 6, 2022

    On December 6, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. The case concerns the issue of whether or not the U.S. government can dismiss False Claim Act whistleblowers' qui tam suits after initially declining to intervene in them. According to whistleblower attorneys, the case has tremendous implications for the efficacy of the False Claims Act. “All of the Justices’ questioning at oral argument appear to be deferential to the government’s position that the DOJ can dismiss a case that it did not initially intervene in,” said whistleblower attorney David Colapinto, a founding partner at the qui tam firm Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto. “However, the Court is struggling with what standard, if any, should be applied by courts at a hearing on the government’s motion to dismiss a whistleblower’s False Claims Act suit, years after the government has declined to intervene in the case.” "During the oral argument the government took the position that it’s just 'too bad' if the whistleblower has spent 'a ton of money' and years litigating the False Claims Act suit. That was brushed off as a reasonable risk that every whistleblower takes when filing suit," continued Colapinto, who has represented False Claims Act whistleblowers since the 1980s. "This turns the False Claims Act statute on its head. Congress created the right of a whistleblower to bring these suits without the government to protect the taxpayers." “If the ...

  • December 5, 2022

    On December 2, Michael D. Kohn, founding partner of the leading whistleblower law firm Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto (KKC), joined four representatives from the Libyan government to discuss whistleblowing in the United States and abroad. Kohn is also co-founder and president of the National Whistleblower Center (NWC). Friday’s event, which took place at the Meridian International Center, was one of many presentations that KKC and NWC put on for international guests. Titled “Anti-Corruption and Accountability within Governmental Institutions: A Project for Libya,” Kohn’s presentation covered U.S. whistleblower reward laws, government programs, and pending laws supporting whistleblowers in different fields. The participants hailed from audit, finance, and banking roles in the Libyan government. As part of the State Department’s professional exchange program, the International Visitor Leadership Program, these officials travel across the U.S. learning about American culture, business practices, and governmental affairs. Kohn explained the process in which whistleblower rewards are paid, which comes at no expense to U.S. taxpayers. During the Q&A segment, participants asked about the history of modern day whistleblower laws, penalties for false or frivolous whistleblower tips to government officials, and media involvement in the world of whistleblowing. Kohn also discussed the cultural motivations to blow the whistle. While honesty is taught to be praised in many scenarios, Kohn explained, it may backfire and lead to retaliation in instances of whistleblowing. This is where financial rewards ...

  • December 2, 2022

    Each year the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of the Whistleblower releases an Annual Report to Congress detailing the activities of the highly successful SEC Whistleblower Program. The annual report for the 2022 Fiscal Year (FY 2022), which ended on September 30, reveals that the SEC Whistleblower Program had a record-setting fiscal year. The SEC received a record 12,300 whistleblower tips in FY 2022 and issued 103 whistleblower awards totaling approximately $229 million. Here are some key takeaways from the report: SEC Whistleblower Program Continues Success of Record-Shattering FY 2021 “Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 continued to build on the record-breaking success of FY 2021 for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Whistleblower Program,” the report begins. In fact, FY 2021 was not just a record-breaking year but a record-shattering one. That year, the SEC received a record 12,200 whistleblower tips and issued a record $564 million in whistleblower awards to a record 108 individuals. Over the course FY 2021, the whistleblower program issued more awards than in all previous years combined. The SEC Whistleblower Program’s Annual Report for FY 2022 shows that FY 2021 was not a fluke. In FY 2022 the SEC received a new record 12,300 whistleblower tips. It also once again issued over 100 whistleblower awards. While the overall monetary amount awarded to whistleblowers dipped, the difference can almost entirely be attributed to two $100 million-plus awards issued by the ...

  • November 28, 2022

    On November 28, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a $20 million whistleblower award to an individual whose disclosure contained “new and critical information that led to the success of an enforcement action,” according to the SEC. "Today’s whistleblower played a crucial role in the ultimate success of the enforcement proceeding," said Creola Kelly, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower. "Whistleblowers can help advance existing investigations in meaningful ways when their information saves the agency time and resources, and when their contributions allow SEC staff to better understand complicated issues." Through the SEC Whistleblower Program, qualified whistleblowers, individuals who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information that leads to a successful enforcement action, are entitled to an award of 10-30% of the sanctions collected by the SEC in the case. The SEC weighs a number of factors in determining the exact percentage to award a whistleblower. In this case, the SEC “considered that the whistleblower provided significant information and continuing assistance that helped Enforcement Division staff more quickly and efficiently investigate complex issues,” according to the agency’s press release. However, according to the award order, the SEC also negatively assessed the facts that the whistleblower “was involved for a short period and at the direction of his/her supervisor in the conduct underlying part of the Covered Action” and “delayed reporting for over two years after being ...

Subscribe for News & Resources

Receive exclusive updates and news from our firm.