HomeThe Whistleblower HandbookRule 25: Win the Case: Prove Motive and Pretext

Rule 25: Win the Case: Prove Motive and Pretext

Whistleblower Retaliation Cases Evolves Around Proving Causation

“[E]vidence that a defendant’s explanation for an employment practice is ‘unworthy of credence’ is one form of circumstantial evidence that is probative of intentional discrimination.”

Justice Thomas, Desert Palace v. Costa (2003)