Whistleblower Protections Under the First Amendment
“The public interest in having free and unhindered debate on matters of public importance [is] the core value of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment…the threat of dismissal from public employment is [a] potent means of inhibiting speech.”
Justice Thurgood Marshall, Pickering v. Board of Education
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” – The First Amendment
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) (establishing the actual malice standard, which has to be met before press reports on public officials can be considered libel; decided in the context of the civil rights movement)
Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers, 383 U.S. 53 (1966) (limiting the availability of state remedies for libel to those instances in which the complainant can show that the defamatory statements were circulated with malice and caused the complainant damage)
All information submitted in the client intake form or in email from anyone seeking legal help is covered under the attorney client and work product privileges to the fullest extent of the law.
Your communications are secured and sent over 256-bit SSL encryption. Protect your identity and confidentiality, do not use any devices owned or controlled by a private corporation or governmental entity. It is also recommended to protect your online identity by establishing a new email account that does not identify you and to avoid the use of other online platforms that may disclose your identity.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive whistleblower news and resources crafted & curated by the partners and associates at KKC.